A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:50 on May 30, 2015, the Defendant reported to the effect that the Defendant 112 reported that he drinked and frighted, and that the assistant F belonging to the police box, such as the assistant F, who was called to the Defendant, listened to the reporter G’s report details, etc., and prevented himself, who was the president of the above main unit, to attract the H’s flab, and assaulted twice the face flab by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on crime prevention and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and H;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The same sentence as the order shall be determined in consideration of the following: (a) the basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) (a person who has been specially punished] (a decision of sentence] the defendant's face of a police officer, etc.; (b) although the defendant's appearance of a police officer is not easy, it is not against the defendant's mistake in depth; (c) the defendant's mistake is not identical; and (d)