1. Defendant A is punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of two million won, and Defendant C is punished by a fine of two million won.

2...

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person in charge of the duties of the Gu office and the duties of the Gu office to purchase repair and expendable goods under several contracts for snow removal equipment, etc. operated by the Gu office, and the defendant B is a person who actually operates G and H in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government under the order of the government office while performing the duties of repair and supply of equipment for snow removal equipment, etc. used by the government office with the order of the government office. The defendant C is a person who supplies expendable goods, such as a tent, etc. used by the government office upon the order of the government office while actually operating the J in Seoul.

1. With respect to the repair of equipment for the engineering work of the E-Gu office, the Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendant A and Defendant B submitted a written estimate, at the request of the Defendant A, which is more unfavorable than the actual repair details, and the Defendant A submitted a written estimate, which was conducted by the Defendant A, and thereby, ordered G or H to conclude a multiple contract, which was conducted by the Defendant B, and made a written tally prepared as if all repair work stated in the written estimate have been completed thereafter, and submitted it to the E-Gu office of the victim to receive service payment.

Accordingly, around March 2012, Defendant B submitted a written estimate to Defendant A regarding the repair, etc. of cleaning equipment of road facilities ordered by the Gu office, and Defendant A made Defendant B enter into a number of contracts with Defendant B by providing the said written estimate. On March 26, 2012, Defendant B prepared a written tally report to the E-gu office located in Seoul, the E-gu office located in Seoul, for which KRW 5,483,000 is required to complete the work, including repair cost, and submitted it to the financial affairs and public officials in charge of the victim E-Gu office around that time.

However, in fact G is submitted by Defendant A even though the content stated in the written estimate has not been actually accepted.