The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below (one month of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the circumstances that the court below rendered on the grounds of sentencing and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too unreasonable, and there are no other special circumstances to change the above sentence. Thus, the above unfair sentencing argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da14448, Apr. 1, 200). However, the Defendant’s appeal is clearly a clerical error in the “Titlet 33” of criminal facts of the judgment below 14, and it is obvious that it is a “Titlet 43”