Defendant

All appeals filed by B and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant B’s punishment (2 million won in penalty) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendants by the prosecutor (a fine of two million won is imposed on each of the Defendants) is deemed unreasonable.

2. However, in the case of this case, Defendant A thefted 27 Dolet 25 times over about 3 months, and Defendant B obtained the above Dolet 27 chapter from Defendant A free of charge, and the fact that the crime was inferior is unfavorable.

However, there are no particular criminal records except punishment for a crime of 191, and Defendant B has no previous criminal records exceeding the same criminal records or suspended execution. However, there are favorable circumstances, such as that the Defendants reflects the mistakes, the head of 17 head of Plet 17 head is recovered from the victim, and Defendant A has no previous criminal records exceeding the same criminal records or suspended execution.

In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, sex, environment, family relationship, economic situation, circumstances after the crime, etc. of the Defendants, the sentence of the lower court against the Defendants is deemed appropriate.

3. The appeal by Defendant B and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.