Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 30, 2014, the Defendant, without a driver’s license on August 21, 2014, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.207%, driven a C-Wood vehicle at a section of approximately 50 meters from the front of the police box, which is located in the mountain village of the Jeonbuk-si in the Jeonbuk-si in the front of the police box, to the front of the road located in the same Dong.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. Inquiry about the results of the control of drinking driving;
1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;
1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 (C) of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that there is a family member to be supported by the defendant for the reason of sentencing, under favorable circumstances in which the degree of blood alcohol concentration appears to be reflected, under significant high level of the numerical value of blood alcohol concentration, and the defendant appears to be driving under the state of full adoption. The defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for one year of imprisonment for the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) in the previous district court's branch court on September 20, 2012, and violation of the Road Traffic Act in the previous district court's branch court's branch court on September 28, 2012. The sentence becomes final and conclusive on September 28, 2012, taking into account each extenuating circumstance unfavorable to the defendant