Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[B] On November 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, etc. by the District Court of Jung-gu on November 20, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2016.

[2] Around October 24, 2014, the Defendant conspiredd to have the sales proceeds distributed on the Internet without paying the sirens, after leaving a siren on October 24, 2014.

On October 24, 2014, the Defendant searched a massage on the Internet along with C and D, and then applied for a siren from the victim Syrend Co., Ltd. for a siren of KRW 129,500 on a monthly rent of KRW 39 months on the condition that ownership is transferred, and B lent its name after completing the procedure for identification as the applicant for a siren.

However, the Defendant, C, and D had no certain revenue or assets as a bad credit or unemployed, and B had a debt worth approximately KRW 12 million on the part of the Ethnb, R&C, etc., and even if they were married, they did not have the ability and intent to pay sirens, but rather had the intent to sell them on the Internet.

Defendant

B, C, and D around October 30, 2014, Defendant, B, C, and D were installed from the injured party at the F’s house, the seat of which is the seat of 108 Dong Dong-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, at the market price of 5,050,50 won.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim and acquired the property from the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of public prosecution with regard to C or D;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. An agreement of a siren, or a written confirmation for the establishment of a siren;

1. Internet bulletin;

1. Before judgment: Application of the text of the judgment of the District Court 2015 High Court 1787, which is the subject of the statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Articles 347 (Selection of Punishment) of the Criminal Act;

1. Handling concurrent crimes;