Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) departed from an influorous restaurant in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, who performed drinking together; (b) decided to raise money from the Internet website and the Republic of Korea; and (c) made a false statement as if B calls to the Victim Purd Co., Ltd., Ltd., with his or her inside her name-free counselor and then used her name-free math to her and paid the monthly rental expenses.

However, the defendant and B did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if they were delivered by the massage.

The Defendant and B received delivery from the injured party one of the “Defren New Zealand S” worth KRW 7,780,500 at the market price as the house of pro-dong-gu D 202, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written agreement on the decline shotma, a written confirmation for installation, and a photograph installed by a chair;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing posting notices on the Internet;

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Articles 347 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a case where the defendant, in collusion with B, deceiving the victim without any intention or ability to pay the price, and is not good for the crime, and the defendant has been punished twice in fraud, and in particular, on January 13, 2016, the Incheon District Court sentenced the defendant to a suspended sentence of 10 months for fraud and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years, and did not know about the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, the necessity of strict punishment corresponding to his liability is recognized.