logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019. 02. 12. 선고 2018나55647 판결
납세고지서 송달이 이루어지지 않았다는 점에 대하여 납세의무자에게 입증책임이 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court-2017-Ban-505847 (Law No. 13, 2017.09)

Title

The taxpayer bears the burden of proving that a tax notice has not been served.

Summary

The case presumed that the notice was lawfully served, unless the plaintiff presents evidence to prove that the burden of proof exists on the plaintiff and the plaintiff does not prove that the notice is not served on the ground that the notice was not served on the plaintiff.

Cases

2018Na5647 Action for cancellation of attachment registration

Plaintiff

United StatesA

Defendant

Korea

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 18, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

February 21, 2019

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Recognizing the judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

the court of the first instance duly adopted and examined evidence

The conclusion of the judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The conclusion of the judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The assertion of invalidity of an administrative disposition and seek nullification thereof

In administrative litigation, the plaintiff has the responsibility to assert and prove that the administrative disposition is null and void.

High Court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 91Nu6030, Mar. 10, 1992). Such a legal principle is null and void administration.

It is reasonable to view that a disposition is equally applied when it becomes a preliminary question of determination. The judgment of the court of first instance is delivered.

Comprehensively taking account of the circumstances examined in the trial and trial, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is not sufficient to transfer the instant capital gains.

It is insufficient to deem that no taxation disposition exists or there is no grounds for invalidation in the above taxation disposition;

There is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

2. Conclusion

Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance shall be this.

As the conclusion is justified, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow