Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing vehicle.
On February 3, 2017, the Defendant moved and proceeded with the said vehicle on the front side of the point in Ansan-si, the 76th of Ansan-si, the Seoul Agricultural Cooperative.
Since there is a road where people pass by, in such a case, there was a duty of care to properly see the front and rear sides and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle and to accurately operate the steering gear and the brakes.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not discover that the victim D (76 tax) who was going to the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle before the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and did not discover that it passed by the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle before the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and applied the victim’s left side to the front side of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 10 weeks of care due to the above occupational negligence from the flusium flusium flusium and flusium flusium flusium.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Written statements of D;
1. A traffic accident investigation report and a diagnosis report;
1. Application of the statutes governing traffic accident photographs;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Taking account of the following: (a) the degree of injury of the victim for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is more severe; (b) the victim was not agreed upon; (c) the accident by gross negligence is not an accident by gross negligence; and (d) the fact that comprehensive insurance is not applicable by divorce; (c) medical expenses are paid within the scope of liability insurance; and (d) the victim was additionally paid KRW 3 million to the victim; and (e) the economic condition and health conditions