logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.31 2018고단5151
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a CMW U.S. car.

On February 15, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car around 15:13 on February 10, 2018, and proceeded the front way of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, along the three-lanes of the five-lane road in the customs clearance distance.

Since there is a crosswalk on which signal lights are installed at the front of that place, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure whether the defendant is a person standing the crosswalk by reducing the speed of the motor vehicle and checking well the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, while driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the traffic signals to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in violation of the signal while keeping the front door of the vehicle, and caused the above victims to go beyond the floor by driving the victim E (10 years old) who was on the right side of the crosswalk installed on the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant, and the victim G (44 years old) who was driving the kick on the left side of the crosswalk installed on the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant, and driving the F otobba, with the front part of the vehicle of the Defendant.

After all, the Defendant caused the victim E to suffer injury, such as the safrecing of the body body felbine, accompanied by a non-alley felture that requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment, and the victim G suffered injury, such as the safreing of the saf and the safining of the safre, which require approximately 4 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting of a traffic accident (1) (2);

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each written diagnosis and written confirmation of discharge for each admission;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (the recognition of and reflects on crimes);

arrow