The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (7 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized and reflecteds the crime, and that it is the primary offender, are favorable to the sentencing.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the Defendant from February 2, 2012 to August 2013 by depositing more than KRW 130 million over 543 times, and the degree of illegality is not small. The crime of gambling is likely to cause social harm, such as promoting an excessive spirit of gambling to the general public, failure in home economy, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to strictly diversify it. The court below already reduced the fine amount of summary order (10 million won) in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant. It is unreasonable to deem that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, considering various sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

(However, in the second half of the decision of the court below, the phrase "for the defendant, over 665 times habitually" is obvious that "for the defendant, over 665 times" is a clerical error in the Rules on Criminal Procedure, and thus ex officio correction is made in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure