The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendant is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant was unable to engage in monetary difficulties; (b) the Defendant was forced to stop the instant gambling; (c) there was no record of punishment for the same kind of gambling; and (d) there is considerable amount of debt to be borne; and (e) there is a considerable need for economic circumstances.

2. The instant crime was committed from October 3, 2013 to December 6, 2013 by depositing KRW 15,00,000 from around 79 to making a private sports climate gambling. The degree of illegality is not small. The crime of gambling is likely to cause social harm, such as promoting excessive speculative spirit to the general public and causing the failure of home economy, and thus, it is necessary to sufficiently diversify the instant crime. In light of the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s character, character, environment, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing, even considering the circumstances asserted in the grounds for appeal, there is no reason to believe that the sentence of the lower court is unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that there is no ground for appeal for conclusion. It is so decided as per Disposition