Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On June 26, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for an injury by continuation, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 10, 2020 by the Ansan Prison.
On February 27, 2020, at around 04:15, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported before the building B in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, and took a bath to D, who was employed by the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station C commander of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station, for the chest and hand, carried the body of the said D, carried the body of the said D several times, and continuously carried out the flasing of the said D with the chest and hand, and assaulted the outbreak of the said D in front of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon.
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 Reporting Cases, the protection of people's lives, bodies and property, and the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.
around 11:07 on April 25, 2020, the Defendant cut off shopping bags consisting of the victim G’s stacks on the outside table, crenzs on the outside table, and 83,500 won of artificial snow.
Around 04:47 on May 26, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported on May 26, 2020, 112 to the effect that he was seated on the street above the 374-ro Don-dong from his river route of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station H District, the Gyeonggi-do Police Agency, which was called out by the Defendant, and was urged by the police officer I to return home from the police officer I belonging to the H district unit of the Gyeonggi-do Office, the Gyeonggi-do Police Agency to the effect that he was seated on the street; (b) Don-do, Don-do; (c) Don-do, Don-do, Don-do; and (d) Don-do, Don-do; and (d) Don-do, Don-do, Don-do; and (d) Don-do, Don-do, Don-don-do.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 reported cases and patrol affairs.
Summary of Evidence
Before ruling: Criminal history record inquiry, etc.