The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal in the instant case can be evaluated as “injury” in the crime of injury by indecent act by indecent act, although the symptoms of this case do not constitute “injury” in the crime of injury by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act, the lower court rendered a judgment that the victim’s indictment against the crime of indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by compulsion was dismissed on the ground that the victim’s revocation of the complaint was erroneous, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, from April 8, 2012 to the point of view, was a person who had been aware of the victim D (the age of 40) while taking a course of study in the “C Language Institute” in detail in the Philippines from around April 8, 201.

피고인은 2012. 12. 29. 02:00경 필리핀 세부 E에 있는 피해자의 집에서, 저녁식사에 초대받아 식사를 하던 중 밤이 깊자 하룻밤 재워 줄 것을 요청하여 머물고 있던 중, 피해자를 강제추행할 마음을 먹고 잠든 피해자의 몸 위에 올라타 양손으로 가슴을 만지고, 이에 잠이 깬 피해자가 거실로 몸을 피하자 뒤따라가서 양손으로 피해자의 양팔을 붙잡으며 강제로 두 차례 키스를 하여 피해자를 강제추행하고, 이로 인하여 피해자에게 약 5일에서 7일간의 치료가 필요한 양측 팔의 위쪽 및 왼쪽 대퇴부의 타박상을 입게 하였다.

B. The lower court determined that the injury suffered by the victim appears to have been naturally cured without any other medical treatment or treatment, and it is difficult to view the above situation as injury in the crime of bodily injury resulting from indecent act by indecent act by indecent act, and ultimately, the Defendant cannot be punished as injury by indecent act by indecent act.