logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.13 2017나8820
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A criminal judgment against Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Emergency Measure No. 9”) against Plaintiff A around April 1977, when the president of the G organization was the president of the G organization of the Mapo-Mapo-ro Association, the President’s Emergency Measure No. 9 for the national security and the protection of public order (hereinafter “Emergency Measure No. 9”).

2) On April 12, 197, the Plaintiff was indicted for a violation of Emergency Decree No. 9. After being investigated into the violation of the Act. On September 19, 1977, the Plaintiff was convicted of the violation of Emergency Decree No. 9, and on September 19, 197, “On April 9, 1977, at the second floor of the I Pharmacy located at H, J, K, etc. around 18:00, in collaboration with, “1....., the law and social system reform the law and social system that suppresss or reserves the fundamental rights and the right to life, and restore free democracy. 2. (2) The Plaintiff was convicted of the violation of Emergency Decree No. 9.3. The suspension of the press assembly’s pressure on April 4, 1977; (3) the Plaintiff was found to have prepared a new draft of imprisonment with prison labor for the National Assembly’s release of the name and the right to life of new young people under the name of the Republic of Korea Association.”

Plaintiff

A appealed against the above judgment, but the judgment of dismissal was rendered on December 22, 1977 by the Gwangju High Court 77No430, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

hereinafter referred to as "instant judgment subject to a retrial"

B. Under the Act on the Restoration of Honor and Compensation to Persons Related to Democratization Movements and the Compensation Deliberation Committee’s Decision on May 15, 2001, Plaintiff A is a person related to democratization movements.

arrow