logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.05 2015재고합2
대통령긴급조치제9호위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: (a) the Defendant was a person who is the H of the Mapool Korea Youth Association, on April 18:00 of 197, and jointly with the second floor, K, L, etc. on the second floor of the J pharmacy located in Mapo-si I on April 18:00 of 197; and (b) the Defendant asserted that “1. The law and social system which suppresss or reserves the fundamental rights and the right to life of the people and the social system and restored liberal democracy; (c) the Defendant suspended all acts of monitoring, restricting, and threateninging the activities of the church, temples, and Mapo-ris; and (d) the suspension of the pressure of the press assembly on March 4, 198, the Defendant tried to promptly release any person detained in the Republic of Korea with the justice of the Mapo-do; and (d) prepare a name report in the name of the Korean Association of Mapo-Don Korea’s preliminary school, which was opened in Gwangju National School events.

2. The progress and judgment of the instant case

A. According to the records of the instant case, the Gwangju District Court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in accordance with the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9 (hereinafter “Emergency Decree No. 9”) on September 19, 197, and sentenced the Defendant “two years of suspended execution and suspension of qualifications for one year” and the said judgment on December 30, 197 becomes final and conclusive.

B. In the event of a serious crisis that can not be dealt with by the means of exercising power in accordance with the constitutional order at ordinary levels of 19 unconstitutionality of the Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9 for the national security and the protection of public order, the decision of the President with respect to the national emergency power which is exercised to ensure the existence of the State should be respected. However, such national emergency power should be exercised to the minimum extent that it is essential for the State to remove the direct cause of the crisis when it faces a serious crisis.

arrow