The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment (limited to eight months of imprisonment and 40 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized his mistake in the trial and reflected his mistake.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant by deceiving about one million won in total from the victim 21 times, by coercioning the victim more than seven times in total, and was committed by assaulting and injuring the victim several times, and the case was serious. The defendant committed the crime of this case in this case even though he was sentenced to four months of imprisonment on April 27, 2012, which was sentenced to imprisonment on April 14, 2012, and was in repeated crime period after the execution of punishment was completed, and again committed the crime of this case on May 14, 2012, and he did not submit any particular data about the recovery of the victim's damage until the trial, and the victim did not wish to punish the victim, and the defendant had the record of punishment several times of the same kind of crime. Considering the circumstances that there was no change in circumstances or circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, the court below's decision is not found to be unfair, and it is not recognized that there were excessive circumstances in the oral proceedings and the records of this case.

5. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.