The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the punishment imposed by the lower court (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his or her misunderstanding, and that the defendant has a family member to support the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by deceiving three victims about KRW 210,00,00 in total, and the case is not easy. In particular, the crime of the victim D is committed by deceiving the victim D by deceiving that the victim would receive more death insurance money of the previous wife, and there is no liability for the crime, and the defendant has been punished two times by fraud, and there is a history of having been punished by imprisonment for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act, embezzlement, violation of the Road Traffic Act, robbery, robbery, robbery, bodily injury, robbery, robbery, and robbery, etc. There are several kinds of crimes, such as punishment of this case. The defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. on September 2, 2009 and sentenced to punishment for the crime of this case on November 21, 201, which was committed again even if the execution of the punishment was completed for a repeated crime, and the defendant did not submit the personal debt and living expenses of the victim who acquired the money and changed the circumstances of the crime, and did not have any special circumstances to be considered.

3. As the appeal by the defendant is groundless, Article 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.