logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.10.16 2014가단118636
차임 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 53,037,140 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from September 10, 2015 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 30, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Nonparty C and D, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 24,00,000 for the Seocho-gu Seoul E building 2706 (hereinafter “instant officetel”), from December 30, 201 to December 29, 2012, with the lease term of KRW 13,20,000 for the monthly rent (including value-added tax).

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

After that, under the consent of Nonparty C and D, the Plaintiff used the instant officetel as the Defendant. From March 1, 2012, the Defendant agreed to pay the unpaid management expenses and rent from December 2011.

C. The Defendant did not pay KRW 39,600,000 for three months from March 1, 2012 to May 31, 2012 for the instant officetel.

The Defendant paid the instant officetel management expenses from December 201 to December 30, 201, but did not pay the said management expenses, and the E-management council, which is the management body of the instant officetel, filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for the claim for unpaid management expenses, etc. from December 30, 201 to August 30, 2012 against the instant officetel (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Da3160286), and the said court rendered a judgment accepting the said claim on November 7, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant judgment”).

On November 19, 2013, the Plaintiff paid total of 12,437,140 won, including unpaid management expenses, to the E management council.

E. On the other hand, on April 6, 2014, the Plaintiff lent KRW 1 million to the Defendant by remitting KRW 1,000,000 to the Defendant’s Korea Cit Bank account.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute or do not clearly dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment as to the plaintiff's primary claim

A. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is from March 2012 to May 2012.

arrow