logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.27 2014가단76000
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a party-related building of the window of Changwon-si (hereinafter “instant building”).

) The owners of heading 601 and 901, and ASEAN are the owners of heading 801 of the instant building (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant heading” in the total of heading 601, 801, and 901.

(2) Defendant B is a person who operates a pharmacy in 101 of the instant building and serves as the president of the instant building that manages the instant building; Defendant C is a person who was the head of G and G and G and general hospital of the instant building that F leased and operated the instant house from the Plaintiff and E (hereinafter “G Council”).

B. On October 2012, F closed the lease and close the G Council members. A lease agreement entered into between the Plaintiff and E and F with respect to the instant family register also terminated on December 2012. 2) Defendant C entered the instant family register for the purpose of handling medical devices, furnitures, etc. after the closure of G Council members’ request, and reading and issuing copies of medical records.

C. 1) On November 28, 2013, the Korea Industry Limited to the Entrusted Management Business Co., Ltd. of the instant building issued a certificate of the content that the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to pay 22,494,720 won of the unpaid management expenses up to the part of November 28, 2013 in the name of the instant building prosperity. (2) The Plaintiff sent a written reply to the purport that the unpaid management expenses are not correct on December 6, 2013. On January 14, 2014, the Plaintiff sent a written notice to the effect that F, who was a lessee, paid the management expenses up to the part of December 2012, 2012, and that the unpaid management expenses were excessively claimed from January 2013.

3 The Plaintiff and E filed a claim for the confirmation of the existence of excessive management expenses incurred in relation to the instant house units from January 2013 to December 2, 2014 with respect to the instant building units through the instant lawsuit, and on July 30, 2015, the management expenses until July 30, 2015, between the instant building prosperity and the end of July 2015.

arrow