The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is against the defendant's wrong judgment, and the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the suspended sentence, etc.; however, the defendant has been sentenced to a fine or a criminal punishment for suspended sentence several times due to drinking driving. In the end, the sentence of punishment is inevitable since the defendant's prior sentence to a suspended sentence was not helpful to have the defendant abandon the habits of traffic offense. In this case, even though the defendant was punished two or more times due to drinking driving, it constitutes a case where the Road Traffic Act is severely punished by driving under the influence of drinking, and the court below has sentenced the maximum sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, and taking into account the defendant's age, health, character and behavior, family environment, drinking alcohol level, blood alcohol concentration level, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's sentence (six months) is appropriate and too unfair.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so. It is so decided as per Disposition.