logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.17 2015고정333
사기등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015, 33"

1. Opening of a mobile phone in B name;

A. On March 5, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document and uttering of a falsified document: (a) indicated B’s resident registration number and address in the column of the applicant’s resident registration number, resident registration number and address in the column of the applicant’s address with the intent to exercise the right at the mobile phone sales store of D’s trade name; (b) indicated B’s resident registration number and address in the column of the applicant’s address; and (c) voluntarily signed in the column of the contractor.

As a result, the Defendant forged two copies of the application for new mobile phone subscription, which is a private document on the rights and duties for the purpose of uttering, and, as seen above, submitted a forged application for new mobile phone subscription to the mobile phone B to an employee who is not aware of the forgery, thereby exercising it.

B. Although the Defendant did not obtain the consent of paragraph 1(a) date, time, and place, he/she obtained two mobile phones equivalent to the total market value of KRW 1,566,400 from SKS and acquired them by forging and submitting an application for new entry into a mobile phone in the above name B.

2. Opening of a mobile phone in the E name;

A. On May 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) indicated the applicant’s resident registration number and domicile in the “E”, resident registration number and address column without authority in the mobile phone subscription application form for the purpose of uttering in the above D; (b) stated the applicant’s column “E” in the applicant’s resident registration number and address column; and (c) written the applicant’s column “E” and written his/her signature arbitrarily thereafter.

As a result, the Defendant forged the application for new entry of a mobile phone, which is a private document on the rights and duties for the purpose of uttering, and used it by submitting the application for new entry of a forged B mobile phone, to the employee who is not aware of the forgery.

B. The criminal defendant committed fraud at the time and place of the second paragraph (a).

arrow