Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the relationship between the Defendant ( South, 70 years of age) and the Victim B (n, 70 years of age) who were divorced in 2006 and live together.
At around 23:40 on March 17, 2019, the Defendant considered the victim from the window C in front of the Changwon-si, as a telephone, that the victim slicked.
Therefore, on the ground that "the victim has drinking alcohol" is considered as "the victim has drinking alcohol", he saw "this walth year", and assaulted the victim's balth by cutting balths into the ground floor three times or more by cutting down the victim's balthm.
2. The judgment is a case in which the victim cannot institute a public prosecution against the clearly expressed will of the victim. According to the written agreement dated May 3, 2019, it is apparent that the victim expressed his/her wish not to prosecute the defendant after the institution of the public prosecution of this case. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.