All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendants were deadly hedging.

Around 00:30 on 00:0 on 05:0 on 00:30, Defendant B, who is in the Chungcheongbuk-gun C, worked as an entertainment agent, and (1) Defendant A came to the workplace of Defendant B who did not want to talk despite Defendant B’s hedging with Defendant B, and (2) Defendant B, on the ground that “I have been found due to her being present,” Defendant B’s “drawing,” and Defendant B’s hand, which she used for his cigarette (tobacco) at one time, assaulted Defendant B at the end of this part; (3) Defendant B, against this, she opposed “I have come to go to go to go to go to the right side of Defendant A,” and she took the right side part of Defendant B by drinking, and she again walked Defendant B at one time on the right side part of Defendant B by assaulting Defendant B, and she took the right side side part of Defendant B with her new assault, and she took the right side part by drinking.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case against the Defendants is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

The record reveals that the defendants expressed their intent not to be punished against the other party after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, all of the prosecutions of this case against the defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.