Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. who has violated the Road Traffic Act shall threaten or cause danger to other persons, or cause danger to road traffic, by repeatedly committing two or more acts, from among violations of signalling or instruction, central crime, speed violation, violation of crossing, internship, and backward prohibition, violation of safe distance, violation of prohibition of changing course, violation of prohibition of rapid brakes, violation of prohibition of overtaking or obstruction, violation of methods of overtaking on an expressway, etc., violation of prohibition of crossing, internship or backward, and violation of prohibition of crossing, operating on an expressway, etc.;

On April 29, 2020, the Defendant, while driving Otoba on the road in front of Mapo-gu Seoul, was at the center line, and was ordered to stop from E, but the Mapo Police Station D Teamman of Mapo Police Station, in order to escape from the control, was at the time when the control was faced with normal bicycle driving along the center line in the vicinity of the F regularly on the same day, and continued to run in violation of the signal from the F Sastm.

The Defendant continued to order the suspension of the traffic of the Seoul Mapo Police Station and the border of the D Team on the front of G, but the Defendant invadedd the central line to escape and was in the opposite direction, and threatened many unspecified drivers with danger or injury, or caused danger to traffic.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of Daba in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

around 16:07 of April 29, 2020, the Defendant driven the above Obama and continued to drive the front road of Mapo-gu Seoul.

Since there is a center line of yellow-ray, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service should thoroughly operate the entire city and safely in compliance with the tea.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and as described in the above Paragraph 1.