1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance was modified as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On April 20, 1974, the part of the first instance court’s 4, 16th to 18th unit “the Plaintiff constructed cement block structure warehouse 90.27 square meters on the instant land, and has been used as a village joint warehouse until now (the location of the warehouse in the building ledger became K of the Gangseo-gun, the Gangwon-gu, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and was corrected to B, the lot number of the instant land, according to the Plaintiff’s application for correction of parcel number on November 10, 2017).”

(b) Nos. 17, 18, 32 “A” shall be added to the 4th 19th 19th 19th 19th 4th 4th 19th 196

C. On April 20, 1974, the Plaintiff occupied the instant land for not less than 20 years by constructing a village joint warehouse on the instant land from April 20, 1974 to using it as a site, and the possession of the instant land is presumed to have been peace and public performance by the intention of ownership.

However, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance from 6th to 13th is "Therefore, the claim for the acquisition by prescription of possession of the land of this case premised on the plaintiff's autonomous possession is without merit without any need to further examine the remaining points.

"Flags".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.