1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the court of first instance renders a dismissal to the fourth to fifth to fifth to the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, and therefore, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. No. 4, No. 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to the following parts:

As to this, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that, “The Defendant paid KRW 72,216,480 to F only formally in collusion with F for the purpose of harming the Plaintiff and deceiving the court, the Defendant’s joint and several liability obligations of the Defendant C still remain. According to the entries in the evidence Nos. 8 and 9 as well as the witness F, the Defendant paid KRW 72,00,000 to F in a collection order (Seoul District Court 2013TTT7260) as of May 10, 2013, according to the testimony of F, the Defendant paid KRW 72,00,000 to F in part of the amount that the Defendant received from the Defendant. However, the Plaintiff’s assertion that each of the above facts of recognition and the evidence Nos. 3, 5, and 6 are insufficient to admit the Plaintiff’s assertion, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.”

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.