Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-5705 (2016.15)

Cho Jae-2013-China-3094 ( December 30, 2013)

(D) The substance of the amount that the Plaintiff received from the close meeting is the brokerage fee for the right to property.

(C) In the event that the land purchase agreement between the Plaintiff and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City is concluded, it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff received the instant amount from the above clans in return for mediating the agreement on the land acquisition between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

Article 21 of the Income Tax Act

2016du4636 global income and revocation of such disposition.

LL

Head of △ District Office

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu57705 Decided June 15, 2016

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by