logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.23 2015고단353
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 28, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on December 28, 2006, and was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on November 24, 2008.

1. Around November 8, 2014, the Defendant had been punished more than two times due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) as above, the Defendant driven a B Sti-type car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.179% from the front day of the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the front day of the Gu-dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City-type 374-6 Gwangju Special Metropolitan City-type Do-type 374-6, while driving the B Sti-type car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 200 meters.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a passenger car in B SP.

On November 8, 2014, 04:05, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.179% 0.179%, and continued three-lanes in front of the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City military automatic parking lot at a speed that is impossible to identify three-lanes depending on the flow distance from the old doctor distance.

At the same time, since the vehicle traffic was a road near the intersection, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle safely and safely.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the back part of the D vehicle driven by the victim C (the age of 61) who was driving in front of the Defendant’s passenger car due to the Defendant’s negligence while neglecting it.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dynasium in need of medical treatment for about three weeks due to the above occupational negligence in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking.

(i) the evidence;

arrow