logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고정2657
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the defendant are those who drive the B body-wide car.

On June 11, 2013, at around 20:25, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, leading three lanes prior to 1135-8, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to the unsurging distance of the agricultural and fishery product market at an unsurging speed.

In such cases, a person engaged in automobile business has a duty of care to properly see the front door and the left door and the left door, and to accurately manipulate the steering direction and brake system, to prevent accidents from occurring.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s progress, the Defendant: (a) concealed the back part of the part of the part of the victim’s DYF YF rocketing car in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and thereby damaging the back part of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, thereby damaging the part of the victim’s vehicle; (b) damaged the vehicle in front of the victim’s vehicle; (c) damaged the victim’s vehicle with the repair cost of KRW 378,266; (d) damaged the victim’s vehicle in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment; and (e) damaged the victim’s vehicle E, who is the passenger of the victim’s vehicle, by causing the victim E, for about three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Notwithstanding the fact that the driver of a vehicle in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is prohibited from operating a vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the Defendant operated a vehicle from the street in front of the 88 Olympic Park, which is located in the inciting the right of right of way in Suwon City, to the point of accident, with the Defendant’s vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at the time specified in the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident actual condition survey report and a traffic accident occurrence report;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis, estimate, and mandatory insurance policy;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts;

arrow