The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Sexual assault against the defendant for 80 hours.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes by Public Prosecutor provides that where a person who committed a sexual crime is convicted of a conviction, an order to attend a lecture or order to complete a sexual assault treatment program shall be issued concurrently, barring any special circumstance.

Since the defendant continued to commit the same type of forced indecent act twice, it is extremely high risk of repeating the crime.

Nevertheless, the court below did not impose an order to attend a course or order to complete a program against the defendant, which cannot be viewed as an appropriate sentence of sentence.

B. The Defendant recognized all of the mistakes and committed a serious offense. The Defendant committed a serious offense.

Although the defendant tried to commit the crime against the victim and deliver the agreed amount, the victim did not want to have contact with the defendant.

The defendant was a 30-year teacher. The defendant was dismissed from office due to the crime of this case.

Accordingly, allowances such as public officials' pension will be reduced in a considerable part.

The defendant has no previous conviction except two cases of the same kind of force.

After the defendant was suspended from indictment in 2013, the defendant has consistently contributed to the sexual assault counseling center for women with disabilities in Seoul.

It is clear that the sick age of the mother who suffers from dementia will rapidly decline when the defendant is sentenced to a severe punishment.

In full view of these circumstances, the defendant has the highest preference as permitted by the law.

2. The instant crime was committed again by the Defendant, who committed a similar crime in the past, committed an indecent act by only female students’ chests and buckbucks when they were aged at the gold public entertainment facility, and the crime is very poor.

In addition, this case, such as the defendant's age, family relation, sex, career, environment, details and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, criminal experience, etc.