logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.28 2017누67928
영업정지(45일) 처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than the following, and thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff do not differ significantly from the contents of the first instance court’s argument, and even if the evidence submitted by the first instance court and the evidence additionally submitted by this court are examined, the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s argument are justifiable). The second ground for appeal is that both the “witness” of the fourth, fourth, third, third, fifth, fifth, fifth, and sixth last, third, third, third, and third, third, third, third, and third, third, third, third, and third, third,

"O or N" in the 4th sentence shall be added to "O".

The first 5th 11-12 letter "(F talks about the first 11-2 letter)" means "(F referred to the name "E" and confirmed whether there are three or more persons, and the last 6th 1-12 letter "N talks that only one customer will now go to N)."

Part 8 "No. 390" in Part 11 of the related Acts and subordinate statutes shall be changed to "No. 428".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow