logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.10.30 2014고정2379
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, while married with the victim B (the age of 54), was divorced, and was living together even after the divorce.

On August 10, 201, the Defendant: (a) contacted the victim at the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and (b) 10 million won on the basis of his refusal by the victim; (c) but (d) her hand was boomed on the ground of his refusal by the victim; and (d) assaulted the victim’s face by drinking and drinking.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the public trial records, a written agreement was submitted on September 18, 2014, after the institution of the instant public prosecution, stating the victim’s intention not to be punished against the Defendant. Thus, the public prosecution in the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow