Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant, while married with the victim B (the age of 54), was divorced, and was living together even after the divorce.
On August 10, 201, the Defendant: (a) contacted the victim at the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and (b) 10 million won on the basis of his refusal by the victim; (c) but (d) her hand was boomed on the ground of his refusal by the victim; and (d) assaulted the victim’s face by drinking and drinking.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the public trial records, a written agreement was submitted on September 18, 2014, after the institution of the instant public prosecution, stating the victim’s intention not to be punished against the Defendant. Thus, the public prosecution in the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.