beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s decision to grant settlement money on March 21, 2013 to Plaintiff A, B, and C with respect to the land of Pyeongtaek-si, Plaintiff C, D, and E.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. (1) On March 3, 200, the Governor of Gyeonggi-do announced on March 3, 200, pursuant to Article 12 of the former Urban Planning Act (repealed by Act No. 6655 of Feb. 4, 2002), the Gyeonggi-do public notice of the city planning (financial expenses) in which Pyeongtaek-si J as the project site is the project site, and the project implementation authorization for the land readjustment project of Pyeongtaek-si District in accordance with the above urban planning (hereinafter “instant project”) was made on May 21, 2007 by the project implementation authorization for the land readjustment project of Pyeongtaek-si District in accordance with the above urban planning.
(2) On February 22, 2008, the Defendant approved a land substitution plan for the instant project pursuant to Article 47 of the former Land Readjustment Project Act (amended by Act No. 6252 of Jan. 28, 2000), and publicly announced February 22, 2008 as the designated land substitution effective date pursuant to Article 56 of the same Act.
B. The Plaintiffs related to land ownership are co-owners of Pyeongtaek-si F Forest Land (hereinafter “instant F land”), G forest land of 198 square meters (hereinafter “instant G land”), and H forest land of 31 square meters (hereinafter “H land”), which belong to the instant project site, and the specific equity relationship with each of the instant land is as follows.
Land A BDD E E 1/31/31/3 - - G land - 1/51/51/53/5 - H land - 1/51/51/5 3/5
C. (1) On March 21, 2013, after deliberation by the Land Appraisal Council, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of the payment of the land substitution settlement money with KRW 12,907,50 of the instant F land, KRW 610,00 of the instant G land, KRW 61,910,00 of the instant land, and KRW 9,723,650 of the instant H land under Article 68 of the former Land Rearrangement and Rearrangement Project Act, Article 16(2) of the Seodaemun District Ordinance, and Article 50(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the said Ordinance.
(2) Specific calculation of liquidation money for each land of this case shall be as follows.