Text
1. Defendant A’s land rearrangement cooperative, Defendant B’s joint ownership of KRW 350,360,600 and its related amount on April 11, 2012.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 20, 1994, pursuant to Article 16 of the former Land and Rearrangement Project Act (repealed by Act No. 6252 of July 1, 2000; hereinafter the same shall apply), and Article 4 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Land and Rearrangement Project Act (repealed by Presidential Decree No. 16933 of August 2, 2000; hereinafter the same shall apply), Defendant A Land and Rearrangement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Union”) was designated as a project implementer and authorized to establish an E Land and Rearrangement Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”) to implement the Land and Rearrangement Project at the Gyeong-si and D Day.
B. On August 31, 1995, the Defendant Union obtained authorization for a land substitution plan for the instant project on condition of disposing of state-owned land from the Mayor/Do Governor.
C. In accordance with the Rules on Delegation of Affairs concerning Gyeongbuk-do (No. 2305), the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Gu was re-entrusted by the Gyeongbuk-do Governor with the approval of the modification of the project in this case and the publication of the public inspection pursuant thereto. At the request of the Defendant Union, the Si of the Si of the Si of the Gu of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Gu of the Si of the Si of the Si of
On December 9, 2004 to December 28, 2004, pursuant to Article 61 of the former Land Readjustment Project Act and Article 2 of the Addenda (Act No. 6252 of Jan. 28, 2000), the Defendant Union made a public announcement of the work completion and the change of disposition of replotting (disposition). At the time, 84 of the above 855 persons subject to the public perusal were made public inspection.
E. In the course of carrying out the instant project, the Defendant Cooperative classified the land in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) as land subject to settlement of money as indicated in the attached list, which was owned by the Doldong Farmland Improvement Association (the Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the said Association pursuant to the Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation and Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation Act, and thereafter the trade name of the said Korea Agricultural and Rural Community Corporation and the Plaintiff was successively changed to the Plaintiff; hereinafter the same shall apply).