1. The Defendant: 21,611,351 won, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, and G respectively; 14,407,567 won, Plaintiff H, I, J, K, L, and M.

1. Basic facts

A. In the case of the sacrifice of civilians in the ancient Chang-gu area, the military police squad consisting of the 6th class of the 20th class of the 11th group, 6th class of the 20th class of the 11 group, the 8th class of the 8th class, the former North Korean police, and the senior police, etc., who belong to the defendant of the 11th class of the 1950 group, was in progress from November 1950 to May 1951.

In the process, the majority of the civilians in the above regions were killed by police and military personnel without due process due process due to salutism, rapid salutism, salutism, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “the civilian sacrifice case in the ancient area”). (b)

1) The Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter “The Act on the Settlement of History”) is the Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation.

(1) The Committee on the Settlement of History for the Truth and Reconciliation established pursuant to the Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Committee on Settlement of History”) shall be deemed to be the Committee.

A) From December 1, 2005 to November 30, 2006, from 129 to 1206, an application was received for ascertaining the truth regarding the case of sacrifice by civilians in the ancient area located at the time of the 625 War, and the investigation of applicants, reference witnesses, data investigation, on-site investigation, etc. were conducted. (2) As a result, the past History Settlement Commission decided on June 30, 2010 that “the murdering of an armed civilian who was employed by the National Armed Forces and the police in their occupation without legitimate procedures in the ancient area around the Korean War is against the humanitarianism, and it is a tort that infringes on the right to life, due process, and the right to trial, which are fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the Constitution.”

3) At the time of the above decision, the previous management committee of the company in charge of the military scambling in front of the mountain village reservoir in the mountain village, which was located in the ancient Chang-gun of North Korea on January 5, 1951 (No. 28, 1951) and inciting the public interest of the Chang-gun of North Korea on January 5, 1951 (hereinafter “the deceased”).

The truth-finding decision was made to determine that the deceased and the network AI were killed and that it was confirmed as a victim of the civilian sacrifice case in the ancient area.