logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.06 2013가단323254
소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be assessed by adding a principal lawsuit and a counterclaim;

Reasons

A. The registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant ownership transfer”) was completed.

B. The plaintiff and the non-party C are friendship relationships.

C. On January 21, 2014, C was convicted of 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the following criminal facts in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch, and C appealed appealed, but the appellate court also maintained the judgment of the first instance court except for concurrent crimes due to concurrent crimes (U.S. District Court Decision 2014No729) and the said judgment of the appellate court became final and conclusive on May 2014.

1. Forgery of private documents;

(a) On June 7, 2011, the Defendant (referring to C; hereinafter the same shall apply) delegated all the rights for the sale of Nos. 101, 501, G real estate representative, without authority, on the paper A4, using a test color pen for the purpose of exercising the rights.

Address: Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do

D. Multi-household 501: Resident Number 501:******************: Name) stated the victim’s seal impression impression in its next page, and the Defendant forged A’s letter of delegation in the name of private document on rights and obligations.B. Around June 7, 2011, the Defendant presented the forged power of representation as stated in paragraph 1(a) to H, a licensed real estate agent, and then requested H to prepare a sales contract on the instant L, and H made a request to prepare a sales contract on the instant L, a real estate located in the location of the real estate by using the computer, and the sale price column in the seller’s column with the name of “Seoul-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City KRW 143,00,000 (Won 143,00,000)” and the seller’s seal attached to A, “Seoul-do Da multi-household 501 and A”.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a sales contract in the name of A, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant is in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City I around June 7, 2011.

arrow