Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the branch office of the hospital E in the National Health and Medical Industry Workers Union.

On March 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) prepared a loget stating the following: (b) “To have three representatives of non-members selected by the E Hospital History on the part of the company at the labor-management council; (c) to have the three representatives of the non-members of the non-members of the non-members of the labor-management council; and (d) to have the representatives of the workers recognized by the company (the current number of nurses of the emergency center, who caused medical accidents by wrong injection to all patients; and (d) the representatives of the occupational categories (the registered nurse who promoted to the former number of nurses) who work for the nurse representative, caused medical accidents by wrong injection to the patient while serving for others; and (d) conducted a demonstration by putting the above loget in front of the E Hospital located in F from 08:00 to 08:30.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by openly pointing out facts, damaged the honor of the victim G and the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A complaint;

1. Details of the proteket news, and content No. 34 of the prote in the strike of a chapter E of the hospital;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is a true fact and solely for the public interest. Thus, there is a reason for excluding illegality under Article 310 of the Criminal Act since the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances, which were duly adopted and examined by this Court, the defendant argued that the victims who were not formally elected by the trade union are the representatives of workers from the private sector.