logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.04.29 2015재고단66
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 14, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud and a crime of violation of defense law at the Gwangju District Court, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence at the Heung prison on April 24, 2013.

[2014 Highest 819] Fraudulents against Victim C (168 million won) was made on October 14, 2013 to the effect that the Defendant borrowed money to the victim C (54 years old) on October 14, 2013 at the E teahouse located in Gwangju Dong-gu. The Defendant borrowed money to the victim C (54 years old) on the ground that “A corporation shall be the Chairman of the Gangwon-do, and it is urgently needed to pay money.” On October 24, 2013, the Defendant would make a false statement to the effect that “A payment shall be made without any molding it by October 24, 2013.”

However, in fact, the defendant is not the chairperson of the lecture, and the defendant did not have a claim for construction cost equivalent to KRW 2 billion against others, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to pay it.

On October 14, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.8 million from the victim to the post office account opened in the name of the Defendant on October 14, 2013, and received KRW 9 million by the same method on the 17th day of the same month, and acquired the money by receiving KRW 16.8 million in total by remitting KRW 5 million by the same method on the 19th day of the same month.

[2014 Highest 1495] Fraud against Victim F (10 million won)

1. On June 2013, the Defendant displayed the construction drawings and documents related to the apartment construction at H hotel coffee shop located in Gwangju-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu, and falsely concluded that “The apartment construction is being conducted on a chemical level, and the apartment construction is being operated at the construction site at the Jeju-gu site.”

However, there was no intention or ability to grant the right to operate the restaurant even if the defendant received money from the injured party due to the lack of progress of apartment construction in the order of harmony.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, and deceiving the victim, under the name of the Defendant on July 17, 2013.

arrow