(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.07.07 2016고합559

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.07.07 2016고합559

강간등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

In addition, around January 2016, the claimant for the observation order for protection (hereinafter “Defendant”) decided to contact with the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) and the smartphone fluor “D” to remain only for the conditions. However, the victim did not appear at the place of the promise, and thus, the victim did not appear at the place of the promise.

1. On May 14, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (sexual traffic) promising the victim to pay 300,000 won as the price for sexual traffic to pay the victim in the first time.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

2. The fraud defendant would pay 30,000 won to the victim as the price for sexual traffic at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1).

A false statement was made.

However, as above, the Defendant had no intention to pay sexual traffic to the victim from the beginning because the victim was suffering from religion.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, committed a single sexual intercourse with the victim, and did not pay 300,000 won for sexual traffic, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount of escape.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

3. The Defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim at the time, time, and place described in paragraph 1, and had the number plate of the vehicle on which the victim was on board.

On May 31, 2016, the Defendant sent the victim’s vehicle number and telephone number to G, which is an Internet site, if the Defendant contacted with the victim through “D” at a Daegu Non-K, at around 21:30 on May 31, 2016. On the other hand, the Defendant sent the victim’s vehicle number and telephone number to G, and by threatening the parent of the victim to know that the victim had sexual traffic, thereby making the victim talking with the victim, and thereby making the victim a little talking about the fact that the victim had sexual traffic. The Defendant is the Fel described in

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.18 2017고정3293

-광주지방법원 2017.12.01 2017고단4566

-대구지방법원 2017.09.15 2017고합285

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.06.16 2015고합82

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.02.22 2017고합149