beta
Text
1. Defendant Pwd Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff:
A. Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, indication 2, 3, 4.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 11, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant Pream Korea Co., Ltd. with regard to the lease deposit of KRW 40 million, monthly rent of KRW 40 million, and the lease term of KRW 4 million from January 20, 2014 to January 20, 2016. (B) The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant Pream Korea with regard to the lease deposit of KRW 35 million, KRW 35 million, KRW 35 million, and KRW 420,000,000,000 (hereinafter “two real estate”) as indicated in the separate sheet, from among the real estate listed in the separate sheet, from January 20, 2014 to December 11, 2013.
C. On December 24, 2014, the Defendants paid monthly rent by June 11, 2014, and the Plaintiff did not pay monthly rent thereafter, and on December 24, 2014, sent to the Defendants the content-certified mail of the notice of overdue rent and the notice of termination of lease.
The Defendants sent, on January 2, 2015, to the Plaintiff on two occasions on February 2, 2015, that the Defendants would pay the entire amount of unpaid tea to the Plaintiff, but did not pay it until the date of the closing of argument.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since each of the lease agreements between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was terminated due to the termination of two or more phases of the Defendants, the following termination of the lease agreement has the obligation to pay to the Plaintiff one real estate, the Defendant Pream Korea Co., Ltd. has the obligation to deliver two real estate to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant Pream Korea Co., Ltd. has the obligation to deliver two real estate to the Plaintiff from June 12, 2014 to June 12, 2014, and the delivery of one real estate from June 12, 2014 to June 2, 2014 to June 2, 2014 to the delivery of the two real estate, the Defendant Pream Korea Co., Ltd. has the obligation to pay to the Plaintiff the unjust enrichment equivalent to the unpaid rent or monthly rent,
3. Conclusion.