1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, the Defendant, and C are members of the same family club, known to them.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant, around July 4, 2015, are drunkly in front of the “Emp” road located in Yang-si D at Yang-si on July 4, 2015.

Over the ground floor, fighting was put on the ground floor.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant fighting match”). B.

그 후 경찰관이 출동하여 원고와 피고는 이 사건 몸싸움을 멈추었고, 원고는 열중 쉬어 자세를 하고 있었는데, C이 원고의 왼쪽 무릎을 1회 걷어찼다.

C. On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed to require approximately seven weeks of medical treatment due to the left-hand slots, the left-hand slots, the anti-stein fever outside the left-hand slots, the left-hand slots fever outside the left-hand slots, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant injury”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 4-1 through 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's body asserted that the defendant abused the plaintiff among the fighting of this case, and knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne, and the injury of this case occurred by adding the defendant's assault and C's assault. Thus, the defendant is jointly and severally liable with C to compensate for the injury

3. 판단 살피건대, 갑 제4호증의 4, 7의 각 기재에 의하면 피고가 이 사건 몸싸움 도중에 원고의 무릎에 찰과상을 입힌 사실은 인정되나, 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제4호증, 을 제1 내지 6호증(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지에 의하여 인정되는 아래와 같은 사정을 종합하면, 피고가 C과 공모하여 원고의 왼쪽 무릎을 걷어찼다거나 이 사건 상해가 피고의 폭행으로 인하여 발생한 것이라고 보기 어렵고, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

① C was prosecuted on the facts charged that the Plaintiff inflicted the instant injury, and C.