1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 20, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Army and discharged from military service on December 14, 2015.

나. 원고는 “육군훈련소에서 신병교육을 받던 중인 2015. 7. 27. 뜀걸음을 하다가 무릎에 통증이 심해 주저앉아 넘어지면서 무릎을 땅에 부딪치는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)를 당하여 ‘좌측 무릎 연골 파열’의 상이(이하 ‘이 사건 상이’라 한다)를 입었다.”고 주장하면서 2016. 1. 7. 피고에게 국가유공자 등록신청을 하였다.

C. On June 21, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision on the Plaintiff’s non-conformity of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and the requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “In light of the fact that the injury in the instant case was not confirmed to cause the injury, and that there was a medical opinion that the injury in the instant case constitutes an injury incurred in the course of military duty or education and training, or that there was no substantial causal relationship between the occurrence, aggravation, and performance of military duty.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 5 evidence, Eul evidence 2-1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. 원고의 주장 원고는 육군훈련소에서 신병교육을 받던 중인 2015. 7. 27. 아침 뜀걸음을 하다가 무릎에 심한 통증을 느끼고 주저앉아 넘어지면서 무릎을 땅에 부딪치는 이 사건 사고를 당하였고, 이후 군병원에서 적절한 치료를 받지 못하다가 2015. 8. 28. 휴가를 나와 서울대학교병원에서 ‘좌측 슬관절 외측 반월상연골 양동이손잡이 파열’의 진단을 받고 2015. 9. 14. 위 병원에서 ‘좌측 슬관절의 관절경 하 외측 반월상 연골판의 부분절제술’을 받았다.

The plaintiff has no record of being treated with respect to kneeek-free on the left-hand side of the military, and the difference in this case occurred due to the accident of this case.