1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years;

Defendant

A KRW 163,170,000 shall be additionally collected.

Defendant

A. A.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) [2013 Height198] Defendant A was appointed as a public official of Seoul on May 1, 1979 and served in the Housing Bureau I of the Seoul National Housing Administration from March 15, 2004 to April 23, 2008, and from April 24, 2008 to August 31, 2009.

Defendant

At the time of working in H in Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office around 2006, A introduced Defendant B by Defendant C, and received a long-term lease of the J site that Defendant B maintained by Defendant B so that it can build a golf practice range and a golf course per-third party.

Defendant

A points out whether the K management department L in charge of the J site management with Defendant C can receive a long-term lease of the J site with Defendant C, and through relevant public officials, the information related to the basic plan for the utilization of the K site, including the J site of Seoul Metropolitan Government, was delivered to Defendant B through Defendant C.

Defendant

A around spring in 2007, at the H Office of the Seoul central government office located in Seomun-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul central government office, after receiving the direction from Defendant B, one of the mobile phone agency employees, who was found in the direction of Defendant B, was at least 450,000 won at the market price in return for good offices for long-term lease of J site.

B. On April 29, 2008, Defendant A acquired the ownership of the land and the ownership of the entire house, subject to Defendant A’s acquisition of KRW 237,280,000,00, which was established on the land in the aggregate of KRW 400,000,00 in consideration of the conciliation for long-term lease of J site from Defendant B, on the condition that Defendant A acquired the ownership of the land and the ownership of the entire house, and acquired the pecuniary profit equivalent to KRW 162,720,00,000.

As a result, Defendant A accepted a bribe equivalent to the total amount of KRW 163,170,000 for arranging matters belonging to the duties of other public officials by taking advantage of the status of public officials.

2. The offering of a bribe by Defendant B (2013, 198)

A. Defendant B is a site for J to Defendant A, as set forth in Section 1(a) around spring in 2007.