logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2017.11.07 2017고정167
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a vehicle for the use of SM3.

On August 27, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 01:57, and proceeded to the 38th degree of private distance to the university at Seosan-si, Seosan-si.

Since there are three on-and-off signals of red lights, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to temporarily stop immediately before or after the intersection, when there is a stop line or crosswalk by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right, the person engaged in driving service has the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle while paying attention to other traffic.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not temporarily stop the red light on and off, and did so, the Defendant’s negligence, while proceeding without temporarily stopping the red light, brought the back part on the right side of the two-wheeled vehicle of the victim C(38 S) driving DaDV750 L in the right side of the yellow light on the left side of the direction of the course of the course.

In the end, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the 3, 4 c, and so on, the right 4 weeks of medical treatment for each five weeks to the victim E (n, 25 years of age) who is the driver of the damaged vehicle or the passenger of the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E statements;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the investigative report (verification of the contents of suspect vehicle records and video images)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Giving favorable consideration to the fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recognized and reflected by the defendant, the primary offender, the victim C does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the vehicle is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance.

arrow