logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.11.21 2017고정475
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of sod vehicle of Chives of C.

On January 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:00, and led to the direction of veterans hospitals in the direction of the tree apartment zone in the direction of the Korean Gindong of Daejeon.

At the time, there was no good view at night, and there was a duty of care to safely enter the intersection while paying attention to other traffic to a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, as the former is in operation of a yellow and flickering signal at the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the error of entering the intersection without reducing speed, which led directly from the right and the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the left side by the victim D(54 ) which was driven by the EKaren car driving by the Defendant’s vehicle, due to the fact that the yellow light was displayed on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as satise, tensions, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

2. According to the evidence adopted and examined by the court, the following facts and circumstances are as follows: ① The front direction of the vehicle driving of the Defendant was operating a yellow flickering signal; ② the red flickering signal was in operation on the front side of the vehicle driving of the victim; ② in the case where the vehicle signal, etc. is on-and-off lights of red lights, the vehicle and the horse should “if there is a stop line or crosswalk, the vehicle and the horse are in operation with due care for other traffic after temporarily suspending the vehicle immediately before or at the intersection” (Article 4 of the Road Traffic Act; Article 6(2) and [Attachment 2] of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act; the victim entered the intersection without temporarily stopping in violation of this provision (Evidence 22 of the evidence record); ③

arrow