A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on July 26, 2019, the Defendant, on the front side of “C” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. On the ground of the case of assaulting the articles of his taxi, the Defendant was urged to return home from E by the superintendent of the police box belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-gu, Seoul, which called “C” after receiving 112 reports, and the Defendant was able to refrain from stoppinging the taxi engineer, and assaulted the above E at once by drinking, while taking a bath against the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's performance of duties on 112 reported duties and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Investigation report (cry, such as shots);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to police officers E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime as substitute and appears to reflect his mistake; and (b) the Defendant made efforts to recover damage by depositing KRW 200,000 for the victimized police officers; (c) the instant crime was committed in favor of the Defendant; (d) on the ground that the police officers who received 112 report while the Defendant was assaulting the taxi articles on their own without any particular reason and dispatched on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of somewhat drunk, and subsequently obstructed the performance of official duties by assaulting the said police officers on the ground that the police officers would restrain them; and (c) the degree of assault is not good in light of the circumstances and means of the crime; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive for the environmental crime, circumstances before and after the crime was committed, etc., the punishment as ordered by the Disposition shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the process