logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.12.12 2018구합22717
장기요양급여비용 환수결정처분 취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, a social welfare foundation established around 1985, is operating Cyangwon, which is a residential welfare facility for the aged as defined in the Welfare of Older Persons Act (hereinafter referred to as “old-gu”) in Seo-gu, Daegu, as well as Dental Care Center (hereinafter referred to as “Medical Care Center”), which is a long-term care institution providing facility benefits under the Long-Term Care Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as “long-term care center”), and E Welfare Center (hereinafter referred to as “Welfare Center”).

B. From March 22, 2018, the head of Seogu Metropolitan City (hereinafter “the head of Seo-gu”) conducted an on-site investigation on the Plaintiff’s medical care center and welfare center from March 22, 2018 to June 26, 201, the Plaintiff confirmed that the Plaintiff unfairly claimed expenses for benefits as follows.

In violation of standards for placement of human resources, the Plaintiff reported to the Defendant as if the F had worked as a caregiver for 96 hours on June 2015 and violated standards for placement of human resources.

② Although the Plaintiff had a cook prepare for an integrated use of a kitchen by filing a report or obtaining permission in accordance with the relevant statutes from January 2017 to February 2018, the Plaintiff violated the standards for placement of human resources by reporting that the above cook was working at the clinic, and violating the standards for placement of cooks, even if the said cook was deemed to have worked at the clinic.

Around March 2015, the Plaintiff reported that G worked differently from the fact as a caregiver even though it was not a caregiver’s duties, and violated the criteria for additional placement of human resources.

② Around June 2015, the Plaintiff reported that F had worked as a caregiver for 96 hours and violated the criteria for addition of additional placement of human resources.

③ The Plaintiff had a cook to the Defendant from October 2012 to February 2018.

arrow