beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fines 3,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,500,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 1,00,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A: (a) around 13:00 on January 25, 2013, the victim FF (FF) was awarded a successful bid and destroyed and damaged the above apartment E apartment 902, Gangwon-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, and the market price established in the present door of the apartment that was ordered through civil litigation was equivalent to KRW 170,00,000 in the market price established in the present door of the apartment.
2. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant A were willing to enter the said apartment again when Defendant A occupied to exercise the right of retention on the ground of the wage claim that was not received while working as the site manager at the construction site of the said apartment construction site, and acquired the above apartment 902 apartment leased to another person by filing a successful bid with the victim F to obtain a successful bid and received the winning lawsuit.
Defendant
A and B, around 16:00 on January 26, 2013, around 16:00, the victim of the above E apartment 902, which had the title to the judgment of Chuncheon District Court Decision 2012Kadan909, was to recover the right of retention on the above apartment that was delivered through the execution of the delivery of real estate (No. 2013No. 15), and Defendant A instructed Defendant B to enter the above apartment and possess it, and Defendant B could not enter the above apartment in accordance with the direction and set the door and enter another person.
As a result, Defendant A and B invadedd on the real estate delivered by compulsory execution in collusion.
3. At around 11:00 on January 27, 2013, Defendant B made a public insult of the victim, stating, “A has a right of retention. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C.)” to the effect that Defendant B’s Defendant B’s victim was the police officer, along with the police officer, at the same time.”
4. The defendants' co-principal defendants entered the above E Apartment No. 902 as stated in the above paragraph (2) and entered the above apartment building again after they turned out by the victim F and police officers.