logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.08.29 2014고정636
권리행사방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 4, 2011, at the Seoul Eastern District Court, the Defendant: (a) won the instant real estate at a voluntary auction in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F apartment 702 (hereinafter “instant apartment”); and (b) received the transfer of ownership in the name of “G of a limited liability company” operated by the Defendant.

Meanwhile, since January 207, 2007, 33 creditors, including the victim H, etc. (hereinafter “Do Design Claim Group”) were ordered to perform the instant apartment interior construction from the Do Design Corporation, but did not receive the price, they were exercising the right of retention while occupying the instant apartment through I from June 10, 2008.

Defendant

A, as the successful bidder could not set up against the lien holder, in spite of his failure to set up against the lien holder, A arbitrarily deprived of possession of the apartment of this case against the claim suit, A conspiredd to enter into the apartment of this case by pretending to be the lessee of the apartment of this case in the vicinity of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as the owner of the apartment of this case, by neglecting the possession of the apartment of this case.

On June 28, 2012, the J, at around 02:00 on the direction of the defendant, had one infinite person and one infinite person and one infinite person and one infinite person, to remove the current official electronic number height of the apartment in this case, and had one infinite person and one infinite person enter the apartment in this case, and intrudes into the building managed by the victim's Do Design Credit Foundation, and the victim's Do Design Credit Foundation changed the identification number of the present official electronic number height of the apartment in this case where the victim's Do Design Credit Foundation exercises the right of retention, and thereby deprived the possession of the Do Design Credit Group by correcting the present official door.

As a result, the defendant has the J interfered with the apartment of this case possessed by the Damagedo Design Foundation, and the J has the defendant.

arrow